But many have criticised Charles' many incursions into political life because it is conventional for the monarch to stay out of state affairs and leave politics to Parliament- a principle 'established' in 1688. Yet since then, countless monarchs have taken keen interests in government affairs. George II continually pressed the government of the day in the late 1750s for the defence of his homeland of Hanover, George III famously fought tooth and nail for his government to keep on the offensive against the American rebels in the 1770s, Victoria had frequent arguments with Gladstone but loved Disraeli. Even Elizabeth II has attended Cabinet and will surely express her opinions on subjects at her weekly meetings with the Prime Minister. Yet Charles is somehow lambasted by the media for having sensible opinions on climate change, conservation, the unemployed and GM crops!
Much of this of course still comes from many who are still sore over the tragedy of Princess Diana. The fact is, that was their private business. Thousands of people go through divorce and affairs. Who are we to judge them? Whatever mistakes he made as a younger man, he has certainly atoned for them and is preparing to make a greater introduction into public life, which is inevitable as the Queen ages.
Charles has evolved into a compassionate man, a man of intelligence, grit and determination. As the Duke of Rothesay, he maintains a prominent position in the armed forces with a special regard to Scotland and also as Duke of Cornwall. His endless efforts to make climate change and conservation a permanent feature of his values is a testament to his beliefs which are admirable and should be respected. This is a free country more than ever, why should the monarchy be excluded from this?
Of course there are those who say that it is undemocratic. Totally, the monarchy is not elected but for an institution that goes back over 2000 years, the Windsors have earned their place. A monarchy still standing in the 21st Century is a mega achievement and it is a testament to the hard work, patriotism and popularity and also accessibility that the royal family has provided. For in times of war, who is it we all rally to? On Christmas Day, who gives a speech? Who heads our Church? Who signs the laws of state? Who heads the armed forces? I'm sure you'll know.
No elected politician could ever fill their place. Monarchs are not greedy, selfish individuals. They are humans who have beliefs, compassion and often understand far more about reality than most politicians can- and Charles is that person!!
I look positively forward to a Carolinian monarchy whilst looking fondly upon the twilight period of the second Elizabethan age. Of course, Elizabeth II will continue to reign for quite some time yet!
